AI benchmark trust: Cursor pulls its own coding test after Grok 4.5 trained on it
AnalysisA benchmark is only useful if the model has not already seen the answers. Cursor disclosed that Grok 4.5, the coding model it co-launched with xAI, had an earlier snapshot of Cursor's own codebase baked into its training data, which is exactly what CursorBench, built from real Cursor user sessions, is supposed to test blind. Cursor excluded the score from its public comparison and says the tainted data is gone for future models. On the independent Artificial Analysis index, which Grok could not train against, the model ranks fourth with a score of 54. As labs train on everything, the tests meant to rank them keep leaking into the training set, and the cleanest scores are the ones a vendor cannot control.